WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L).
WMVG.L and JPLG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WMVG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Minimum Volatility. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. JPLG.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 9, 2019. Both WMVG.L and JPLG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.80% | 9.08% | 14.49% | 7.33% | -8.31% | 16.96% | -1.30% | 3.80% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 6.06% | 10.11% | 12.09% | 7.05% | 0.72% | 24.67% | 2.57% | -0.56% |
Different Trading Currencies
WMVG.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than JPLG.L's 6.06% return.
WMVG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WMVG.L
JPLG.L
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMVG.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.43 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | 1.88 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.29 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 2.39 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 9.76 | -8.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMVG.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.43 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.95 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMVG.L and JPLG.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMVG.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, roughly equal to the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and JPLG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMVG.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -27.53% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -9.48% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -13.65% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.70% | -3.08% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -3.34% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.65% | +0.10% |
Volatility
WMVG.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) is 2.71%, while JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that WMVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMVG.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 3.48% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | 6.13% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.72% | 11.13% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.98% | 10.98% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.23% | 13.87% | -1.64% |