WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE
WMIN.DE (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WMIN.DE is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while QUTM.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WMIN.DE returned 56.11% vs 33.19% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WMIN.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMIN.DE achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 13.28% return.
WMIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- 6M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 56.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.57%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMIN.DE VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 1.03% | 58.56% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 13.28% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMIN.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WMIN.DE
QUTM.DE
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMIN.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.33 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 3.07 | +2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMIN.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMIN.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.93% | -24.77% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.37% | -24.77% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.76% | -18.69% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -8.07% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 10.79% | -1.53% |
Volatility
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) at 7.62%. This indicates that WMIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMIN.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 7.62% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.68% | 24.70% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.38% | 34.03% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.40% | 32.86% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.38% | 32.86% | -4.48% |
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMIN.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMIN.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMIN.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMIN.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WMIN.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WMIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
WMIN.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while QUTM.DE is Technology Equities. WMIN.DE tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WMIN.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WMIN.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer