PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMIN.DE achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than NUKL.DE's -3.98% return.


WMIN.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
-12.51%
6M
-10.19%
YTD
1.03%
1Y
56.11%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*

NUKL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.29%
6M
-18.40%
YTD
-3.98%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
35.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WMIN.DE
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
1.03%71.98%-2.56%-6.26%
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
-3.98%51.50%38.03%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.51

The correlation between WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMIN.DE
WMIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKL.DE
NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMIN.DENUKL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.50

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

1.01

+4.90

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, roughly equal to the maximum NUKL.DE drawdown of -37.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMIN.DENUKL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-37.52%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.37%

-27.12%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

-37.52%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.76%

-25.05%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-8.72%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

13.30%

-4.04%

Volatility

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) at 8.11%. This indicates that WMIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMIN.DENUKL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

8.11%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

28.89%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.38%

42.02%

-6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.40%

34.52%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.38%

34.52%

-6.14%

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMIN.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKL.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMIN.DE vs. NUKL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMIN.DE nor NUKL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WMIN.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WMIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

WMIN.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while NUKL.DE is Uranium. WMIN.DE tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WMIN.DE and 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMIN.DE and NUKL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer