PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMIN.DE achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than ESP0.DE's -9.42% return.


WMIN.DE

1D
-0.81%
1M
-12.51%
6M
-10.19%
YTD
1.03%
1Y
56.11%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*

ESP0.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
5.48%
6M
-11.18%
YTD
-9.42%
1Y
-8.80%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WMIN.DE
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF
1.03%71.98%-2.56%0.55%10.07%17.35%19.27%7.19%
ESP0.DE
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF
-9.42%13.28%57.80%28.83%-30.18%6.13%65.70%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2019

0.40

The correlation between WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMIN.DE
WMIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ESP0.DE
ESP0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESP0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMIN.DEESP0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.93

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

-0.33

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

-0.52

+6.43

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the ESP0.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.93%, roughly equal to the maximum ESP0.DE drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMIN.DEESP0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.93%

-40.10%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.37%

-26.87%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.37%

-26.87%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-40.10%

+9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.76%

-21.62%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-13.23%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

17.01%

-7.75%

Volatility

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (WMIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) at 5.13%. This indicates that WMIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESP0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMIN.DEESP0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

5.13%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.68%

13.79%

+15.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.38%

17.57%

+17.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.40%

22.43%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.38%

23.43%

+4.95%

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMIN.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESP0.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMIN.DE vs. ESP0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMIN.DE nor ESP0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WMIN.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WMIN.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESP0.DE.

WMIN.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while ESP0.DE is Technology Equities. WMIN.DE tracks S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index, while ESP0.DE tracks MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WMIN.DE and 0.55% for ESP0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMIN.DE and ESP0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer