PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMGAX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMGAX achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than FSMAX's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, WMGAX has underperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 11.47%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


WMGAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.92%
YTD
3.46%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
11.47%

FSMAX

1D
1.07%
1M
5.80%
YTD
14.89%
6M
13.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMGAX
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund
3.46%0.83%10.02%19.97%-30.68%16.22%48.56%38.01%-0.20%26.95%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
14.89%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WMGAX and FSMAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between WMGAX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMGAX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMGAX
WMGAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WMGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WMGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMGAXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

3.12

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

11.05

-9.83

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMGAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMGAX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMGAXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.87

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.31

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.40

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Drawdowns

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMGAX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMGAXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-50.55%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.16%

-10.26%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-26.82%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.95%

-36.31%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.95%

-50.55%

+7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.23%

0.00%

-14.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-12.17%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

2.90%

+2.94%

Volatility

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) is 4.39%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that WMGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMGAXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.70%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

12.46%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

17.17%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

22.33%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.18%

30.24%

-7.06%

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMGAX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

WMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.73%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
WMGAX
Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.73%11.10%15.30%6.66%11.94%13.08%9.97%5.23%10.28%7.92%3.98%10.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WMGAX and FSMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to WMGAX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMGAX dropped -53.74% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMGAX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer