WMGAX vs. FICGX
WMGAX (Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund) and FICGX (Delaware Growth Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - WMGAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds, while FICGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, WMGAX returned 10.94%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for FICGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMGAX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for FICGX.
Performance
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMGAX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than FICGX's 12.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WMGAX has underperformed FICGX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FICGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.
WMGAX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- -1.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
FICGX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 27.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.88% | 0.83% | 10.02% | 19.97% | -30.68% | 16.22% | 48.56% | 38.01% | -0.20% | 26.95% |
FICGX Delaware Growth Equity Fund | 12.72% | 20.49% | 23.76% | 28.68% | -24.65% | 5.54% | 28.41% | 24.12% | -3.89% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMGAX and FICGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.89 |
The correlation between WMGAX and FICGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMGAX vs. FICGX — Risk / Return Rank
WMGAX
FICGX
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) and Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 2.97 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 12.37 | -12.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMGAX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FICGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMGAX and FICGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -54.19% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -9.48% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -20.48% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.95% | -47.73% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.95% | -47.73% | +4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.37% | -1.01% | -15.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -16.18% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.03% | 2.27% | +3.76% |
Volatility
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) is 4.33%, while Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that WMGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 5.10% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 12.38% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.92% | 15.07% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 21.28% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 20.62% | +2.52% |
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMGAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FICGX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMGAX vs. FICGX - Dividend Comparison
WMGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than FICGX's 3.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICGX Delaware Growth Equity Fund | 3.37% | 3.80% | 5.28% | 2.75% | 32.39% | 7.63% | 9.65% | 10.92% | 5.77% | 9.05% | 16.01% | 10.46% |
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 11.00% | 11.10% | 15.30% | 6.66% | 11.94% | 13.08% | 9.97% | 5.23% | 10.28% | 7.92% | 3.98% | 10.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMGAX and FICGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICGX has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to WMGAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMGAX dropped -53.74% vs FICGX's -54.19%.
FICGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMGAX and FICGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer