WMFFX vs. RERGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX).
WMFFX is a passively managed fund by American Funds that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Aug 5, 2008. RERGX is managed by American Funds.
Performance
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | -5.23% | 17.42% | 19.24% | 16.96% | -8.27% | 28.71% | 7.89% | 25.03% | -5.98% | 20.23% |
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 | -5.45% | 29.34% | 3.00% | 16.11% | -22.77% | 2.84% | 25.27% | 27.40% | -17.33% | 31.19% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WMFFX having a -5.23% return and RERGX slightly lower at -5.45%. Over the past 10 years, WMFFX has outperformed RERGX with an annualized return of 11.98%, while RERGX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.
WMFFX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -3.05%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
RERGX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -12.20%
- YTD
- -5.45%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMFFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMFFX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank
WMFFX
RERGX
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMFFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 1.10 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 4.87 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMFFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 1.10 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.19 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.46 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMFFX and RERGX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison
WMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, less than RERGX's 14.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | 10.88% | 10.28% | 10.27% | 5.92% | 6.53% | 6.24% | 3.26% | 6.33% | 4.59% | 7.43% | 6.56% | 6.44% |
RERGX American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 | 14.76% | 13.95% | 4.96% | 3.95% | 2.02% | 10.19% | 0.41% | 3.14% | 3.17% | 4.99% | 1.64% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMFFX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, which is greater than RERGX's maximum drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFFX and RERGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMFFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -37.30% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -12.52% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -37.30% | +18.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | -37.30% | +2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -12.52% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -9.28% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 3.25% | -0.96% |
Volatility
WMFFX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) is 3.59%, while American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that WMFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMFFX | RERGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 6.59% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 11.23% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 16.21% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 16.43% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.32% | 16.78% | -0.46% |