WMFFX vs. GQHPX
WMFFX (Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2) and GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both mutual funds - WMFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while GQHPX is a Quality Factor fund managed by GQG Partners. Over the past 5 years, WMFFX returned 12.50%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for GQHPX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WMFFX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for GQHPX.
Performance
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMFFX achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 13.55% return.
WMFFX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.97%
GQHPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | 9.10% | 17.42% | 19.24% | 16.96% | -8.27% | 11.70% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 13.55% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.94% | 6.73% | 10.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMFFX and GQHPX is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WMFFX and GQHPX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMFFX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
WMFFX
GQHPX
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMFFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.60 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 6.94 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMFFX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFFX and GQHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMFFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -17.26% | -29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -6.50% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.64% | -8.71% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -17.26% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.02% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -3.34% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.43% | -0.51% |
Volatility
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) is 2.38%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that WMFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMFFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 4.31% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 9.14% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 11.03% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 12.73% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 12.74% | +3.54% |
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMFFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMFFX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
WMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than GQHPX's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 3.66% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 | 9.69% | 10.28% | 10.27% | 5.92% | 6.53% | 6.24% | 3.26% | 6.33% | 4.59% | 7.43% | 6.56% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMFFX and GQHPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GQHPX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to WMFFX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMFFX dropped -47.21% vs GQHPX's -17.26%.
WMFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMFFX and GQHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer