WMFFX vs. FALIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WMFFX (Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2) and FALIX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WMFFX returned 13.00%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for FALIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMFFX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FALIX.

Performance

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, WMFFX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 13.00%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.

WMFFX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

FALIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 14.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	5.96%	17.42%	19.24%	16.96%	-8.27%	28.71%	7.89%	25.03%	-5.98%	20.23%
FALIX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I	0.00%	19.65%	26.36%	23.49%	-7.91%	25.81%	8.85%	31.71%	-8.42%	16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WMFFX and FALIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between WMFFX and FALIX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WMFFX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMFFX

WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FALIX

FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 45
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WMFFX	FALIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.81	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.54	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.49	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	2.89	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	4.92	+4.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMFFX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMFFX	FALIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	1.81	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.78	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.77	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.48	+0.12

Drawdowns

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMFFX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, smaller than the maximum FALIX drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFFX and FALIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMFFX	FALIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.21%	-62.37%	+15.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-5.03%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.64%	-18.89%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.53%	-21.48%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.63%	-37.51%	+2.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.17%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.36%	-13.28%	+7.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	2.78%	-0.85%

Volatility

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that WMFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMFFX	FALIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	0.00%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.89%	4.20%	+3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	8.06%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	16.44%	-2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.33%	18.58%	-2.25%

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMFFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMFFX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

WMFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than FALIX's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FALIX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I	5.86%	5.86%	6.10%	3.43%	2.28%	6.51%	5.39%	8.35%	16.78%	6.13%	2.25%	3.16%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	9.74%	10.28%	10.27%	5.92%	6.53%	6.24%	3.26%	6.33%	4.59%	7.43%	6.56%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMFFX and FALIX in my portfolio?

WMFFX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMFFX or FALIX?

WMFFX has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMFFX dropped -47.21% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.