WMFAX vs. SENAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Municipal Bond Fund (WMFAX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX).
WMFAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Apr 7, 2005. SENAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 24, 2000.
Performance
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFAX Allspring Municipal Bond Fund | -0.42% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 5.25% | -8.88% | 1.69% | 3.89% | 7.41% | 1.83% | 5.96% |
SENAX Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund | -9.06% | 13.41% | 19.25% | 24.00% | -41.92% | 2.58% | 57.96% | 40.64% | -5.97% | 28.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMFAX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than SENAX's -9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, WMFAX has underperformed SENAX with an annualized return of 1.98%, while SENAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.26% annualized return.
WMFAX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.53%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
SENAX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- -9.06%
- 6M
- -11.07%
- 1Y
- 15.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMFAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SENAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMFAX vs. SENAX — Risk / Return Rank
WMFAX
SENAX
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Municipal Bond Fund (WMFAX) and Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMFAX | SENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.87 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 3.02 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMFAX | SENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.03 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.40 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.28 | +0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMFAX and SENAX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Dividend Comparison
WMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than SENAX's 13.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMFAX Allspring Municipal Bond Fund | 2.88% | 3.12% | 3.06% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.89% | 3.07% | 3.41% | 3.71% | 3.37% |
SENAX Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.27% | 12.06% | 10.88% | 2.46% | 0.00% | 17.81% | 9.16% | 6.59% | 15.14% | 11.23% | 4.58% | 8.37% |
Drawdowns
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMFAX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum SENAX drawdown of -58.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMFAX and SENAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMFAX | SENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.91% | -58.34% | +43.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.42% | -13.59% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.35% | -55.14% | +41.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.35% | -55.14% | +41.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -26.63% | +24.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -17.72% | +15.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 3.89% | -2.46% |
Volatility
WMFAX vs. SENAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Municipal Bond Fund (WMFAX) is 0.85%, while Allspring Discovery Mid Cap Growth Fund (SENAX) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that WMFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SENAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMFAX | SENAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 7.31% | -6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.44% | 14.32% | -12.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 24.77% | -20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.55% | 28.82% | -25.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 25.70% | -22.06% |