WMBIX vs. WIPIX
WMBIX (Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class) and WIPIX (Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - WMBIX is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index, while WIPIX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Allspring. WMBIX is passively managed, while WIPIX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, WMBIX returned 2.08%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for WIPIX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WMBIX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for WIPIX.
Performance
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMBIX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than WIPIX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBIX has underperformed WIPIX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while WIPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.50% annualized return.
WMBIX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
WIPIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBIX Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 0.68% | 3.08% | 2.47% | 5.56% | -8.63% | 1.99% | 4.21% | 7.75% | 2.13% | 6.27% |
WIPIX Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.32% | 7.37% | 2.37% | 6.79% | -14.02% | 0.18% | 11.63% | 9.45% | -0.19% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMBIX and WIPIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2008 | 0.43 |
The correlation between WMBIX and WIPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMBIX vs. WIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
WMBIX
WIPIX
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (WMBIX) and Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (WIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMBIX | WIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.15 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.10 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 2.75 | +5.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMBIX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum WIPIX drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBIX and WIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMBIX | WIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -18.61% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -2.86% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.09% | -5.15% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.98% | -18.61% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.06% | -18.61% | +5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -2.23% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -2.65% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.14% | -0.48% |
Volatility
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (WMBIX) is 0.75%, while Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (WIPIX) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that WMBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMBIX | WIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 1.00% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.95% | 3.01% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 3.77% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 5.66% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.68% | 4.69% | -1.01% |
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMBIX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than WIPIX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMBIX vs. WIPIX - Dividend Comparison
WMBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than WIPIX's 4.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIPIX Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.93% | 4.84% | 4.89% | 4.25% | 2.79% | 2.73% | 5.48% | 3.99% | 3.03% | 2.93% | 3.10% | 2.48% |
WMBIX Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 3.18% | 3.41% | 3.36% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 2.25% | 2.58% | 3.20% | 3.36% | 3.69% | 4.01% | 3.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMBIX and WIPIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WIPIX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to WMBIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBIX dropped -16.84% vs WIPIX's -18.61%.
WMBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMBIX and WIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer