WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WMAT.AS (SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF) and WTCH.AS (SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMAT.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WTCH.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WMAT.AS returned 10.72%/yr vs 23.98%/yr for WTCH.AS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMAT.AS achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than WTCH.AS's 25.44% return. Over the past 10 years, WMAT.AS has underperformed WTCH.AS with an annualized return of 10.72%, while WTCH.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.98% annualized return.

WMAT.AS

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 20.75%
• 1Y: 29.94%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

WTCH.AS

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: 14.84%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 6M: 23.94%
• 1Y: 48.66%
• 3Y*: 29.25%
• 5Y*: 22.49%
• 10Y*: 23.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMAT.AS SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF	16.65%	11.94%	0.51%	10.28%	-4.85%	25.48%	10.37%	24.72%	-12.74%	13.28%
WTCH.AS SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF	25.44%	8.41%	43.39%	49.09%	-27.66%	40.88%	31.79%	49.43%	1.91%	21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMAT.AS

WMAT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 50
WMAT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
WMAT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WMAT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 49
WMAT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
WMAT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

WTCH.AS

WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 64
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 65
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WMAT.AS	WTCH.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.37	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	3.09	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.18	3.06	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.93	8.10	+0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMAT.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMAT.AS	WTCH.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.37	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.99	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	1.11	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.15	-0.70

Drawdowns

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMAT.AS drawdown since its inception was -41.59%, which is greater than WTCH.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMAT.AS	WTCH.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.59%	-31.28%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-15.67%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.50%	-30.06%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.50%	-30.06%	+9.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.66%	-31.28%	-2.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-2.46%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-5.89%	-6.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	5.96%	-2.63%

Volatility

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) is 6.54%, while SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that WMAT.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTCH.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMAT.AS	WTCH.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.54%	7.02%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	14.82%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	20.28%	-3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	22.45%	-5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	21.39%	-2.68%

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

WMAT.AS vs. WTCH.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMAT.AS nor WTCH.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS in my portfolio?

WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WMAT.AS or WTCH.AS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WMAT.AS or WTCH.AS?

WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

What is the main difference between WMAT.AS and WTCH.AS?

WMAT.AS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while WTCH.AS is Technology Equities. WMAT.AS tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.