PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) and SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMAT.AS achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly lower than SXLK.AS's 24.56% return.


WMAT.AS

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.19%
YTD
16.65%
6M
20.75%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.72%

SXLK.AS

1D
-2.32%
1M
13.89%
YTD
24.56%
6M
23.20%
1Y
49.59%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WMAT.AS
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF
16.65%11.94%0.51%10.28%-4.85%25.48%10.37%24.72%-11.77%
SXLK.AS
SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.56%10.14%31.30%51.14%-25.03%46.32%31.72%51.36%-15.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2018

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMAT.AS
WMAT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WMAT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMAT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMAT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMAT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMAT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLK.AS
SXLK.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) and SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMAT.ASSXLK.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.09

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

8.23

+0.70

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMAT.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMAT.ASSXLK.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.44

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.98

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.99

-0.54

Drawdowns

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMAT.AS drawdown since its inception was -41.59%, which is greater than SXLK.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMAT.ASSXLK.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.59%

-31.37%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-15.83%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-30.08%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.50%

-30.08%

+9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-2.96%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-6.54%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

5.97%

-2.64%

Volatility

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.AS) is 6.54%, while SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that WMAT.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLK.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMAT.ASSXLK.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

7.18%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

14.71%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

20.07%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

22.37%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

22.98%

-4.27%

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMAT.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLK.AS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMAT.AS vs. SXLK.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMAT.AS nor SXLK.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLK.AS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLK.AS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WMAT.AS.

WMAT.AS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SXLK.AS is Technology Equities. WMAT.AS tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SXLK.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WMAT.AS and 0.15% for SXLK.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMAT.AS and SXLK.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer