WLTG vs. IBID
WLTG (WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLTG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by WealthTrust, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. WLTG is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, WLTG returned 28.74% vs 4.68% for IBID. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
WLTG vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLTG achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.40% return.
WLTG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WLTG vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 8.40% | 24.55% | 26.90% | 6.13% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.40% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLTG and IBID is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between WLTG and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLTG vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
WLTG
IBID
WLTG vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.90 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 12.89 | -9.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.59 | 39.18 | -25.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 3.78 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 2.55 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
WLTG vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLTG drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLTG and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.14% | -1.28% | -23.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -0.36% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -0.22% | -8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 0.12% | +2.00% |
Volatility
WLTG vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.33%. This indicates that WLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLTG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 0.33% | +2.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 0.80% | +9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 1.24% | +12.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 2.25% | +12.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 2.25% | +12.88% |
WLTG vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLTG vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
WLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than IBID's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.67% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 4.09% | 4.43% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.44% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLTG and IBID have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLTG has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to IBID (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLTG dropped -25.14% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, WLTG leads with 28.74% vs 4.68% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WLTG has performed better with a 28.74% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WLTG.
WLTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 3.67% for IBID.
WLTG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WealthTrust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WLTG and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLTG and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer