WLGAX vs. WMGAX
WLGAX (Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund) and WMGAX (Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WLGAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds, while WMGAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, WLGAX returned 15.96%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for WMGAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WLGAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for WMGAX.
Performance
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLGAX achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than WMGAX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, WLGAX has outperformed WMGAX with an annualized return of 15.96%, while WMGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.94% annualized return.
WLGAX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.96%
WMGAX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- -1.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLGAX Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | 2.00% | 8.89% | 25.97% | 37.78% | -27.04% | 29.95% | 30.75% | 36.52% | 2.37% | 29.02% |
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.88% | 0.83% | 10.02% | 19.97% | -30.68% | 16.22% | 48.56% | 38.01% | -0.20% | 26.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLGAX and WMGAX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WLGAX and WMGAX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLGAX vs. WMGAX — Risk / Return Rank
WLGAX
WMGAX
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund (WLGAX) and Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLGAX | WMGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.01 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.04 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | -0.12 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLGAX drawdown since its inception was -49.78%, smaller than the maximum WMGAX drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLGAX and WMGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLGAX | WMGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.78% | -53.74% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | -16.16% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -26.59% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.00% | -42.95% | +5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.00% | -42.95% | +5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -16.37% | +15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -13.62% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 6.03% | +0.15% |
Volatility
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund (WLGAX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund (WMGAX) at 4.33%. This indicates that WLGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLGAX | WMGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.33% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 13.91% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 17.92% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 25.17% | -4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 23.14% | -2.44% |
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLGAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than WMGAX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLGAX vs. WMGAX - Dividend Comparison
WLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, less than WMGAX's 11.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLGAX Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | 8.25% | 8.41% | 3.31% | 3.07% | 12.91% | 9.68% | 6.56% | 12.84% | 14.16% | 4.45% | 5.19% | 6.43% |
WMGAX Delaware Ivy Mid Cap Growth Fund | 11.00% | 11.10% | 15.30% | 6.66% | 11.94% | 13.08% | 9.97% | 5.23% | 10.28% | 7.92% | 3.98% | 10.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLGAX and WMGAX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLGAX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to WMGAX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLGAX dropped -49.78% vs WMGAX's -53.74%.
WLGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLGAX and WMGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer