WLGAX vs. FICGX
WLGAX (Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund) and FICGX (Delaware Growth Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Delaware Funds. Over the past 10 years, WLGAX returned 15.98%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for FICGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WLGAX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for FICGX.
Performance
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLGAX achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than FICGX's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WLGAX has outperformed FICGX with an annualized return of 15.98%, while FICGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.02% annualized return.
WLGAX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
FICGX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLGAX Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | -3.43% | 8.89% | 25.97% | 37.78% | -27.04% | 29.95% | 30.75% | 36.52% | 2.37% | 29.02% |
FICGX Delaware Growth Equity Fund | 10.78% | 20.49% | 23.76% | 28.68% | -24.65% | 5.54% | 28.41% | 24.12% | -3.89% | 32.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLGAX and FICGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.90 |
The correlation between WLGAX and FICGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLGAX vs. FICGX — Risk / Return Rank
WLGAX
FICGX
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund (WLGAX) and Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 2.92 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.60 | 12.25 | -11.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLGAX drawdown since its inception was -49.78%, smaller than the maximum FICGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLGAX and FICGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.78% | -54.19% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | -9.48% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -20.48% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.00% | -47.73% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.00% | -47.73% | +10.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -2.22% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -16.21% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 2.25% | +3.86% |
Volatility
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Volatility Comparison
Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund (WLGAX) and Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX) have volatilities of 5.83% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLGAX | FICGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 5.84% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.26% | 11.99% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.93% | 14.79% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 21.24% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 20.63% | +0.08% |
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLGAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FICGX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLGAX vs. FICGX - Dividend Comparison
WLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than FICGX's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICGX Delaware Growth Equity Fund | 3.43% | 3.80% | 5.28% | 2.75% | 32.39% | 7.63% | 9.65% | 10.92% | 5.77% | 9.05% | 16.01% | 10.46% |
WLGAX Delaware Ivy Large Cap Growth Fund | 8.71% | 8.41% | 3.31% | 3.07% | 12.91% | 9.68% | 6.56% | 12.84% | 14.16% | 4.45% | 5.19% | 6.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLGAX and FICGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICGX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to WLGAX (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLGAX dropped -49.78% vs FICGX's -54.19%.
FICGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLGAX and FICGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer