WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L
WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and ROLG.L (iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDS.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while ROLG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDS.L returned 8.21%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for ROLG.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WLDS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ROLG.L.
Performance
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly lower than ROLG.L's 18.44% return.
WLDS.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 17.33%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 35.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- —
ROLG.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- 18.44%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 32.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 17.33% | 11.75% | 8.63% | 11.26% | -8.89% | 16.71% | 12.54% | 20.41% | -14.81% |
ROLG.L iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD | 18.44% | 8.66% | 6.32% | -7.36% | 30.51% | 29.23% | -2.41% | 1.84% | -30.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS.L and ROLG.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.23 |
The correlation between WLDS.L and ROLG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WLDS.L
ROLG.L
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLDS.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.54 | 2.72 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 11.70 | +5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, which is greater than ROLG.L's maximum drawdown of -40.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and ROLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDS.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.18% | -40.64% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -11.80% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.53% | -25.00% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -25.00% | +3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.45% | +11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -18.42% | +6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.75% | -0.66% |
Volatility
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) is 3.49%, while iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Swap UCITS ETF USD (ROLG.L) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that WLDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDS.L | ROLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 4.65% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 14.48% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 16.33% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 22.19% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 21.68% | +0.73% |
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ROLG.L's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDS.L vs. ROLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WLDS.L nor ROLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDS.L and ROLG.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROLG.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROLG.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WLDS.L.
WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ROLG.L is Commodities. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while ROLG.L tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WLDS.L and 0.28% for ROLG.L.
Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and ROLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer