WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L
WLDS.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and IPRP.L (iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDS.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while IPRP.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDS.L returned 7.97%/yr vs -4.25%/yr for IPRP.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WLDS.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IPRP.L.
Performance
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WLDS.L is traded in GBP, while IPRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IPRP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDS.L achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than IPRP.L's -1.60% return.
WLDS.L
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IPRP.L
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -1.60%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.25%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 13.19% | 11.75% | 8.63% | 11.26% | -8.89% | 16.71% | 12.54% | 20.41% | -31.05% |
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | -1.60% | 13.63% | -4.96% | 15.42% | -33.74% | 1.88% | -3.84% | 18.45% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLDS.L and IPRP.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.47 |
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Technology
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Financial Services
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Healthcare
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Basic Materials
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Real Estate
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
Energy
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Communication Services
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Utilities
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
WLDS.L
IPRP.L
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) and iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLDS.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.01 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | -0.00 | +4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | -0.01 | +15.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLDS.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | -0.00 | +2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | -0.20 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.10 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDS.L drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, smaller than the maximum IPRP.L drawdown of -64.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDS.L and IPRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLDS.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.18% | -64.48% | +21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -16.12% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.53% | -16.12% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.53% | -48.77% | +27.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -25.40% | +24.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -16.65% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 6.00% | -3.91% |
Volatility
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WLDS.L) is 3.57%, while iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IPRP.L) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that WLDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLDS.L | IPRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.97% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 13.07% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 15.20% | -2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 21.54% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 19.35% | +3.12% |
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPRP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLDS.L vs. IPRP.L - Dividend Comparison
WLDS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IPRP.L iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF | 2.89% | 2.83% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 4.20% | 2.11% | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.24% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 2.59% |
WLDS.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLDS.L and IPRP.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WLDS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WLDS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IPRP.L.
WLDS.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IPRP.L is REIT. WLDS.L tracks MSCI World Small Cap Inde, while IPRP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WLDS.L and 0.40% for IPRP.L.
Find the right allocation for WLDS.L and IPRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer