WLDL.L vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WLDL.L (Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Amundi and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDL.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for MINV.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WLDL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.

Performance

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDL.L achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.01% return.

WLDL.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: —

MINV.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 1.01%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.15%
• 3Y*: 6.54%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: 7.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WLDL.L Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist	10.10%	12.59%	21.18%	18.07%	-8.98%	24.03%	11.65%	27.40%	-6.60%	1.88%
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	1.01%	3.37%	12.86%	1.50%	1.23%	15.98%	-1.05%	18.84%	3.17%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDL.L and MINV.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between WLDL.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WLDL.L	MINV.L
Technology	28.3%	21.3%
Financial Services	15.7%	14.2%
Industrials	11.4%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	5.4%
Communication Services	9.3%	11.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	10.8%
Energy	4.2%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.0%
Utilities	2.7%	7.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.7%

Return for Risk

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDL.L

WLDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WLDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
WLDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
WLDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
WLDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MINV.L

MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLDL.L	MINV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	0.32	+2.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.08	0.53	+3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.06	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	0.41	+4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.52	1.10	+17.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDL.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLDL.L	MINV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	0.32	+2.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.12	0.65	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.83	+0.21

Drawdowns

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDL.L and MINV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDL.L	MINV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.76%	-20.38%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.59%	-6.31%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.91%	-8.47%	-10.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	-10.23%	-8.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-3.60%	+3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-3.74%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	2.33%	-0.75%

Volatility

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) have volatilities of 2.52% and 2.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLDL.L	MINV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	2.55%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	5.92%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.13%	7.92%	+2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.30%	9.70%	+5.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	11.85%	+6.65%

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDL.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

WLDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLDL.L Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist	1.15%	1.26%	1.61%	1.34%	1.90%	1.34%	1.58%	1.57%	2.41%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDL.L and MINV.L in my portfolio?

WLDL.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WLDL.L or MINV.L?

On fees, WLDL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLDL.L or MINV.L?

WLDL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

What is the main difference between WLDL.L and MINV.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WLDL.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.