PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDL.L is traded in GBp, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDL.L achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than GBDV.L's 7.03% return.


WLDL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.80%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.98%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*

GBDV.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.73%
YTD
7.03%
6M
7.39%
1Y
19.22%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
7.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLDL.L
Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist
10.10%12.59%21.18%18.07%-8.98%24.03%11.65%27.40%-6.60%1.88%
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
7.03%10.06%9.77%1.90%5.38%17.41%-11.68%16.85%-2.63%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDL.L and GBDV.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.45

The correlation between WLDL.L and GBDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WLDL.L
GBDV.L

Technology

28.3%
2.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
24.9%

Industrials

11.4%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
2.4%

Communication Services

9.3%
9.5%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
8.0%

Energy

4.2%
7.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.0%

Utilities

2.7%
15.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
12.1%

Technology

WLDL.L
28.3%
GBDV.L
2.2%

Financial Services

WLDL.L
15.7%
GBDV.L
24.9%

Industrials

WLDL.L
11.4%
GBDV.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

WLDL.L
9.3%
GBDV.L
2.4%

Communication Services

WLDL.L
9.3%
GBDV.L
9.5%

Healthcare

WLDL.L
8.8%
GBDV.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

WLDL.L
5.2%
GBDV.L
8.0%

Energy

WLDL.L
4.2%
GBDV.L
7.3%

Basic Materials

WLDL.L
3.3%
GBDV.L
2.0%

Utilities

WLDL.L
2.7%
GBDV.L
15.9%

Real Estate

WLDL.L
1.9%
GBDV.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDL.L
WLDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDL.LGBDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.39

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.17

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

9.91

+8.61

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDL.L and GBDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDL.LGBDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

2.17

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.63

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.65

+0.39

Drawdowns

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum GBDV.L drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDL.L and GBDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDL.LGBDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-34.77%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-6.04%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-13.42%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-15.84%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.64%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-5.16%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.93%

-0.35%

Volatility

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 2.26%. This indicates that WLDL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDL.LGBDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.26%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

6.52%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

8.81%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

11.74%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

14.13%

+4.37%

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDL.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison

WLDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GBDV.L's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
4.50%4.91%4.49%4.87%5.05%4.26%4.41%4.41%5.18%4.26%4.74%5.72%
WLDL.L
Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist
1.15%1.26%1.61%1.34%1.90%1.34%1.58%1.57%2.41%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDL.L and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WLDL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WLDL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

WLDL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WLDL.L and 0.45% for GBDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDL.L and GBDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer