PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WLDL.L (Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WLDL.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for ANXU.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDL.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.

Performance

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WLDL.L is traded in GBp, while ANXU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDL.L achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 20.15% return.

WLDL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
3.80%
YTD
10.10%
6M
9.98%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
—

ANXU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
8.18%
YTD
20.15%
6M
17.96%
1Y
41.16%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
22.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WLDL.L
Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist		10.10%12.59%21.18%18.07%-8.98%24.03%11.65%27.40%-6.60%1.88%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		20.11%11.32%28.95%48.68%-25.30%28.68%41.33%36.74%4.00%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDL.L and ANXU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.56

The correlation between WLDL.L and ANXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WLDL.L
ANXU.L

Technology

28.3%
53.7%

Financial Services

15.7%
0.2%

Industrials

11.4%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
12.2%

Communication Services

9.3%
15.8%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.7%

Energy

4.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.1%

Utilities

2.7%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Technology

WLDL.L
28.3%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Financial Services

WLDL.L
15.7%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Industrials

WLDL.L
11.4%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WLDL.L
9.3%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Communication Services

WLDL.L
9.3%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Healthcare

WLDL.L
8.8%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

WLDL.L
5.2%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Energy

WLDL.L
4.2%
ANXU.L
0.6%

Basic Materials

WLDL.L
3.3%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Utilities

WLDL.L
2.7%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Real Estate

WLDL.L
1.9%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Often compared with WLDL.L:
WLDL.L vs. SP5L.LWLDL.L vs. CEU1.LWLDL.L vs. ^GDAXIWLDL.L vs. IJPN.LWLDL.L vs. SWDA.LWLDL.L vs. QQQWLDL.L vs. LOWV
Often compared with ANXU.L:
ANXU.L vs. CNDX.ASANXU.L vs. EQQQ.DEANXU.L vs. QQQMANXU.L vs. QQQANXU.L vs. RACE.MIANXU.L vs. 10AJ.DEANXU.L vs. DAPP.L

Return for Risk

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WLDL.L
WLDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WLDL.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.95
2.62

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.08
3.49

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.46

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.75

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

10.60

+7.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDL.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WLDL.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

2.62

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.96

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.22

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.29

-0.25

Drawdowns

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum ANXU.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDL.L and ANXU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WLDL.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-27.52%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-11.12%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-24.28%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-27.52%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.52%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.70%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-4.99%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

3.94%

-2.36%

Volatility

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist (WLDL.L) is 2.52%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that WLDL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WLDL.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

5.05%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

11.73%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

15.89%

-5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

20.08%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

21.14%

-2.64%

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDL.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDL.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

WLDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WLDL.L
Lyxor MSCI World UCITS ETF - Dist		1.15%1.26%1.61%1.34%1.90%1.34%1.58%1.57%2.41%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

WLDL.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WLDL.L.

WLDL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. WLDL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WLDL.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDL.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer