WLCTX vs. GSIMX
WLCTX (Wilshire International Equity Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WLCTX returned 8.95%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for GSIMX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WLCTX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.
Performance
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLCTX achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 8.14% return.
WLCTX
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 27.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.72%
GSIMX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLCTX Wilshire International Equity Fund | 13.91% | 33.77% | 5.89% | 17.15% | -18.87% | 12.29% | 16.52% | 23.53% | -12.73% | 25.54% |
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 8.14% | 20.85% | 9.66% | 22.10% | -11.06% | 12.50% | 15.77% | 27.64% | -6.04% | 29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLCTX and GSIMX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WLCTX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLCTX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank
WLCTX
GSIMX
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire International Equity Fund (WLCTX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WLCTX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.02 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 5.51 | +2.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLCTX drawdown since its inception was -52.88%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLCTX and GSIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLCTX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.88% | -28.84% | -24.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -7.81% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -10.32% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -25.37% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -2.17% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -4.80% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.85% | +0.24% |
Volatility
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison
Wilshire International Equity Fund (WLCTX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.73%. This indicates that WLCTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLCTX | GSIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 2.73% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | 8.18% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 9.85% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 14.25% | +0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.84% | 15.61% | +0.23% |
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLCTX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLCTX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison
WLCTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, more than GSIMX's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.73% | 5.12% | 11.18% | 2.36% | 4.89% | 2.23% | 0.18% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WLCTX Wilshire International Equity Fund | 10.95% | 12.47% | 11.81% | 3.02% | 0.91% | 19.22% | 6.81% | 1.26% | 4.91% | 0.07% | 1.64% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLCTX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLCTX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to GSIMX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLCTX dropped -52.88% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.
WLCTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLCTX and GSIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer