WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS
WITS.AS (iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF) and WHCA.AS (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - WITS.AS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WHCA.AS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care Advanced Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WITS.AS returned 27.21%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for WHCA.AS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WITS.AS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WHCA.AS.
Performance
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WITS.AS is traded in USD, while WHCA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WHCA.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WITS.AS achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly higher than WHCA.AS's 0.97% return.
WITS.AS
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- YTD
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 29.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.34%
WHCA.AS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 17.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.23%
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 17.99% | 22.44% | 27.56% | 37.63% |
WHCA.AS iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.97% | 16.34% | -5.58% | 6.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between WITS.AS and WHCA.AS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023 | 0.15 |
The correlation between WITS.AS and WHCA.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
WITS.AS
WHCA.AS
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) and iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WHCA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WITS.AS | WHCA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.60 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 3.87 | +1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WITS.AS drawdown since its inception was -39.11%, which is greater than WHCA.AS's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WITS.AS and WHCA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WITS.AS | WHCA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.11% | -21.28% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -10.86% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | -21.28% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.61% | -2.98% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -6.06% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 4.49% | +1.20% |
Volatility
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF (WITS.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (WHCA.AS) at 5.02%. This indicates that WITS.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHCA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WITS.AS | WHCA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 5.02% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | 11.18% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 14.92% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 14.31% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 14.31% | +10.19% |
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WITS.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WHCA.AS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WITS.AS vs. WHCA.AS - Dividend Comparison
WITS.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while WHCA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHCA.AS iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector Advanced UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WITS.AS iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.62% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WITS.AS and WHCA.AS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WHCA.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WHCA.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WITS.AS.
WITS.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while WHCA.AS is Health & Biotech Equities. WITS.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while WHCA.AS tracks MSCI World Health Care Advanced Select 20 35 Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WITS.AS and 0.18% for WHCA.AS.
Find the right allocation for WITS.AS and WHCA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer