PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIPIX vs. WMBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (WIPIX) and Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (WMBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIPIX achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than WMBIX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, WIPIX has outperformed WMBIX with an annualized return of 2.80%, while WMBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


WIPIX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
2.80%

WMBIX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.85%
6M
2.15%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.49%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WIPIX
Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.76%7.37%2.37%6.79%-14.02%0.18%11.63%9.45%-0.19%5.67%
WMBIX
Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.85%3.08%2.47%5.56%-8.63%1.99%4.21%7.75%2.13%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WIPIX and WMBIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2008

0.42

The correlation between WIPIX and WMBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIPIX vs. WMBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIPIX
WIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

WMBIX
WMBIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
WMBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (WIPIX) and Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (WMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WIPIXWMBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.76

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.77

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

10.35

-5.10

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the WMBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIPIX and WMBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIPIX drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, which is greater than WMBIX's maximum drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIPIX and WMBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIPIXWMBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.61%

-16.84%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-2.34%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-5.37%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-13.06%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.61%

-13.06%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.06%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-2.19%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.62%

+0.39%

Volatility

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class (WIPIX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (WMBIX) at 0.62%. This indicates that WIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIPIXWMBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.62%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

1.80%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

2.32%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.65%

3.59%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

3.68%

+1.00%

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIPIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WMBIX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIPIX vs. WMBIX - Dividend Comparison

WIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than WMBIX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WIPIX
Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.84%4.84%4.89%4.25%2.79%2.73%5.48%3.99%3.03%2.93%3.10%2.48%
WMBIX
Allspring Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.40%3.41%3.36%2.88%2.54%2.25%2.58%3.20%3.36%3.69%4.01%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIPIX and WMBIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIPIX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to WMBIX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIPIX dropped -18.61% vs WMBIX's -16.84%.

WMBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIPIX and WMBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer