WIP vs. TIP
WIP (SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF) and TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - WIP tracks the FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD) while TIP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WIP returned 1.61%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for TIP. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WIP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for TIP.
Performance
WIP vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WIP achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, WIP has underperformed TIP with an annualized return of 1.61%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.57% annualized return.
WIP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
TIP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.57%
WIP vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 4.31% | 15.18% | -8.71% | 8.84% | -15.54% | -4.15% | 8.37% | 8.62% | -5.97% | 12.73% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.54% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WIP and TIP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2008 | 0.33 |
The correlation between WIP and TIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WIP vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
WIP
TIP
WIP vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WIP | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.52 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 7.57 | -1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIP | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.46 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.16 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.45 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.57 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
WIP vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIP drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIP and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIP | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -14.57% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -1.98% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.16% | -4.54% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -14.51% | -14.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.84% | -14.51% | -14.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -0.32% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -3.43% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 0.66% | +1.06% |
Volatility
WIP vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 0.89%. This indicates that WIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WIP | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 0.89% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 2.29% | +4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.72% | 3.41% | +5.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.45% | 6.21% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.16% | 5.74% | +4.42% |
WIP vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
WIP vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
WIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than TIP's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.79% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WIP and TIP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WIP has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to TIP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIP dropped -29.60% vs TIP's -14.57%.
On 10-year performance, TIP leads with 2.57% vs 1.61% for WIP. On fees, TIP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TIP has performed better with a 2.57% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TIP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIP.
WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 3.76% for TIP.
WIP tracks FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD), while TIP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WIP and 0.18% for TIP.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WIP and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer