PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIP vs. IBIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIP vs. IBIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIP achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than IBIE's 2.10% return.


WIP

1D
-0.72%
1M
0.70%
YTD
4.31%
6M
4.96%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
1.61%

IBIE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.07%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIP vs. IBIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WIP
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF
4.31%15.18%-8.71%6.70%
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
2.10%6.46%3.95%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WIP and IBIE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.36

The correlation between WIP and IBIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIP vs. IBIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIP
WIP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
WIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIE
IBIE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIP vs. IBIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WIPIBIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.69

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

8.73

-6.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

25.70

-19.72

WIP vs. IBIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the IBIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIP and IBIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WIPIBIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

3.09

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

2.02

-1.89

Drawdowns

WIP vs. IBIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIP drawdown since its inception was -29.60%, which is greater than IBIE's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIP and IBIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIPIBIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.60%

-1.70%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-0.55%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

0.00%

-3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-0.39%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.19%

+1.53%

Volatility

WIP vs. IBIE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) at 0.38%. This indicates that WIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIPIBIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

0.38%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

0.97%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

1.56%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.45%

2.86%

+8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.16%

2.86%

+7.30%

WIP vs. IBIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIP vs. IBIE - Dividend Comparison

WIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than IBIE's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIE
iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF
3.25%4.09%4.23%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WIP
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF
5.79%5.51%6.06%6.54%11.15%4.63%1.59%2.49%4.05%1.91%1.27%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIP and IBIE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIP has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to IBIE (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIP dropped -29.60% vs IBIE's -1.70%.

On 1-year performance, WIP leads with 10.26% vs 4.80% for IBIE. On fees, IBIE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WIP has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIP.

WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 3.25% for IBIE.

WIP tracks FTSE International Inflation-Linked Securities Select (USD), while IBIE tracks ICE 2028 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WIP and 0.10% for IBIE.

IBIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIP and IBIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer