WING.L vs. STHS.L
WING.L (iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and STHS.L (PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc) are both High Yield Bonds funds - WING.L tracks the iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) while STHS.L tracks the PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WING.L returned 5.62%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for STHS.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WING.L is traded in USD, while STHS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the STHS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WING.L achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than STHS.L's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WING.L has outperformed STHS.L with an annualized return of 5.62%, while STHS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.50% annualized return.
WING.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
STHS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WING.L iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.95% | 12.63% | 2.89% | 12.92% | -14.36% | 2.26% | 17.97% | 15.54% | -5.11% | 12.38% |
STHS.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc | 2.09% | 16.72% | 6.47% | 16.46% | -15.71% | 3.10% | 5.01% | 12.34% | -7.90% | 14.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WING.L and STHS.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between WING.L and STHS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WING.L vs. STHS.L — Risk / Return Rank
WING.L
STHS.L
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WING.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.08 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 2.74 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WING.L drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, smaller than the maximum STHS.L drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WING.L and STHS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WING.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.18% | -34.30% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.36% | -6.28% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -8.43% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -29.82% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.18% | -34.30% | +9.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -1.25% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -7.38% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 2.49% | -1.38% |
Volatility
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) is 1.58%, while PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that WING.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WING.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.99% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.86% | 6.09% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.85% | 8.02% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 12.10% | -4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 12.40% | -3.31% |
Dividends
WING.L vs. STHS.L - Dividend Comparison
WING.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than STHS.L's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STHS.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc | 7.47% | 7.11% | 7.57% | 6.39% | 4.95% | 4.52% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 5.34% | 5.18% | 5.43% | 0.37% |
WING.L iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.71% | 5.67% | 5.86% | 5.20% | 4.43% | 3.92% | 4.25% | 4.56% | 4.98% | 4.44% | 2.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WING.L and STHS.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WING.L tracks iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while STHS.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.
Find the right allocation for WING.L and STHS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer