PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WING.L vs. HYGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WING.L is traded in USD, while HYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WING.L achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 4.01% return.


WING.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.04%
6M
0.95%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
5.62%

HYGB.L

1D
0.58%
1M
0.40%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.01%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.95%12.63%2.89%12.92%-14.36%2.26%17.97%15.54%-5.11%
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
4.01%9.22%11.83%7.02%-12.94%-0.32%5.02%15.45%-30.18%

Correlation

The correlation between WING.L and HYGB.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.18

The correlation between WING.L and HYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WING.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WING.L
WING.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGB.L
HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WING.LHYGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.04

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

13.36

-8.30

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WING.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WING.L and HYGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WING.L drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, smaller than the maximum HYGB.L drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WING.L and HYGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WING.LHYGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-37.51%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-2.91%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-4.72%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-25.04%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-3.08%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-21.20%

+17.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

0.66%

+0.45%

Volatility

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) have volatilities of 1.58% and 1.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WING.LHYGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

1.59%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

4.63%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

5.32%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

17.85%

-10.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

17.18%

-8.09%

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WING.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WING.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison

WING.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.71%5.67%5.86%5.20%4.43%3.92%4.25%4.56%4.98%4.44%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


WING.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WING.L.

WING.L tracks iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while HYGB.L tracks VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WING.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WING.L and HYGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer