WILIX vs. WXCIX
WILIX (William Blair International Leaders Fund) and WXCIX (William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - WILIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by William Blair, while WXCIX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by William Blair. Over the past 3 years, WILIX returned 12.91%/yr vs 32.67%/yr for WXCIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WILIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WXCIX.
Performance
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WILIX achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly lower than WXCIX's 46.00% return.
WILIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
WXCIX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- YTD
- 46.00%
- 1Y
- 73.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WILIX William Blair International Leaders Fund | 13.77% | 23.21% | -0.50% | 3.20% |
WXCIX William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I | 46.00% | 28.21% | 13.49% | 15.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between WILIX and WXCIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between WILIX and WXCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WILIX vs. WXCIX — Risk / Return Rank
WILIX
WXCIX
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair International Leaders Fund (WILIX) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WILIX | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.90 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 16.05 | -10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WILIX drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, which is greater than WXCIX's maximum drawdown of -19.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WILIX and WXCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WILIX | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -19.66% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -14.78% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.21% | -19.66% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -8.54% | +4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -3.20% | -6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 4.50% | -0.72% |
Volatility
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for William Blair International Leaders Fund (WILIX) is 7.50%, while William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that WILIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WXCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WILIX | WXCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 12.33% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.80% | 23.89% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 26.41% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 19.44% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 19.44% | -1.78% |
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WILIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than WXCIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WILIX vs. WXCIX - Dividend Comparison
WILIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than WXCIX's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WILIX William Blair International Leaders Fund | 7.02% | 7.98% | 0.58% | 0.45% | 0.19% | 2.82% | 0.80% | 0.56% | 4.14% | 2.17% | 1.01% | 0.74% |
WXCIX William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I | 3.78% | 5.52% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WILIX and WXCIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WXCIX has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to WILIX (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WILIX dropped -41.01% vs WXCIX's -19.66%.
WXCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WILIX and WXCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer