PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIGG.L achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than JHYP.L's 2.14% return.


WIGG.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*

JHYP.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.89%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.47%8.82%4.80%11.01%-12.90%4.06%18.27%
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
2.14%9.26%7.69%9.79%-10.02%2.97%14.80%

Correlation

The correlation between WIGG.L and JHYP.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.81

The correlation between WIGG.L and JHYP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIGG.L
WIGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

JHYP.L
JHYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) and JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WIGG.LJHYP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.41

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

14.15

-5.20

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIGG.L and JHYP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WIGG.LJHYP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.05

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.66

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.01

-0.37

Drawdowns

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIGG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, which is greater than JHYP.L's maximum drawdown of -15.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIGG.L and JHYP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIGG.LJHYP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.44%

-15.44%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-2.46%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.30%

-4.58%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.35%

-15.44%

-1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.03%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-3.22%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.59%

+0.25%

Volatility

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) at 1.06%. This indicates that WIGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHYP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIGG.LJHYP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.06%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

2.73%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

4.10%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.92%

5.62%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

5.68%

+1.76%

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIGG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JHYP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIGG.L vs. JHYP.L - Dividend Comparison

WIGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than JHYP.L's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
5.97%6.58%5.96%8.55%5.62%4.37%0.69%0.00%0.00%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.92%5.58%5.74%5.08%4.47%3.89%4.24%4.53%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WIGG.L and JHYP.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHYP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHYP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WIGG.L.

Both ETFs track ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for WIGG.L and 0.35% for JHYP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIGG.L and JHYP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer