PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WIAU.L (iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SDHY.L ( iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both High Yield Bonds funds from iShares - WIAU.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD while SDHY.L tracks the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WIAU.L returned 2.57%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for SDHY.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WIAU.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SDHY.L.

Performance

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) and iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SDHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIAU.L achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than SDHY.L's 1.43% return.

WIAU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.28%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
8.41%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
—

SDHY.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.43%
6M
2.10%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WIAU.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.89%12.49%3.04%12.97%-14.25%1.81%18.31%15.74%-6.29%
SDHY.L
iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist		1.43%8.90%6.50%8.75%-3.27%3.42%4.07%9.61%-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between WIAU.L and SDHY.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.66

The correlation between WIAU.L and SDHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WIAU.L
SDHY.L

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

22.1%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

77.9%

Financial Services

WIAU.L
100.0%
SDHY.L

-

Basic Materials

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Communication Services

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Consumer Defensive

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Energy

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Healthcare

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Industrials

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Real Estate

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L
22.1%

Technology

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L

-

Utilities

WIAU.L

-

SDHY.L
77.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist

Often compared with WIAU.L:
WIAU.L vs. HYFC.LWIAU.L vs. AGGG.LWIAU.L vs. STHE.LWIAU.L vs. SHLDWIAU.L vs. DTLA.LWIAU.L vs. SDHA.LWIAU.L vs. QQQ
Often compared with SDHY.L:
SDHY.L vs. JHYU.LSDHY.L vs. JNKS.LSDHY.L vs. STHE.LSDHY.L vs. EHYG.LSDHY.L vs. GHYU.LSDHY.L vs. GLDSDHY.L vs. JGYH.L

Return for Risk

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WIAU.L
WIAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
WIAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
WIAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
SDHY.L
SDHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SDHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SDHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) and iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SDHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WIAU.LSDHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.43
2.09

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
3.19

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.91

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

17.14

-10.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the SDHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIAU.L and SDHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WIAU.LSDHY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.09

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.84

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.78

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.69

-0.11

Drawdowns

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIAU.L drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than SDHY.L's maximum drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIAU.L and SDHY.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WIAU.LSDHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-18.94%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-1.83%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

-4.51%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

-8.41%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-18.94%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.19%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-1.28%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

0.42%

+0.78%

Volatility

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SDHY.L) at 1.16%. This indicates that WIAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WIAU.LSDHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.16%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

2.69%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

3.43%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.16%

5.46%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.42%

6.33%

+3.09%

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SDHY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIAU.L vs. SDHY.L - Dividend Comparison

WIAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SDHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDHY.L
iShares $ Short Duration High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist		8.31%6.59%6.41%5.64%4.31%4.24%4.80%5.26%5.48%5.42%5.68%5.05%
WIAU.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WIAU.L and SDHY.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDHY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDHY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIAU.L.

WIAU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while SDHY.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield 0-5 Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WIAU.L and 0.45% for SDHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIAU.L and SDHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer