WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L).
WIAU.L and GFGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WIAU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2018. GFGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. It was launched on Mar 19, 2018. Both WIAU.L and GFGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WIAU.L iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.31% | 12.49% | 3.04% | 12.97% | -14.25% | 1.81% | 18.31% | 15.74% | -6.29% |
GFGB.L VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 0.95% | 10.14% | 6.07% | 9.77% | -12.76% | 2.37% | 16.54% | 14.18% | -4.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
WIAU.L is traded in USD, while GFGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GFGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WIAU.L achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than GFGB.L's 0.95% return.
WIAU.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
GFGB.L
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WIAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GFGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
WIAU.L
GFGB.L
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WIAU.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.62 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.28 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 7.88 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WIAU.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.37 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between WIAU.L and GFGB.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WIAU.L nor GFGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WIAU.L drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, roughly equal to the maximum GFGB.L drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIAU.L and GFGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WIAU.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -15.95% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -3.33% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.83% | -10.36% | -11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | 0.00% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -2.55% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 1.38% | -0.29% |
Volatility
WIAU.L vs. GFGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WIAU.L) is 2.39%, while VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that WIAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WIAU.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 2.77% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.68% | 4.67% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71% | 6.52% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 8.37% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 9.19% | +0.28% |