PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHYIX vs. EWHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (WHYIX) and Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHYIX achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly lower than EWHYX's 3.35% return.


WHYIX

1D
0.11%
1M
1.13%
YTD
2.77%
6M
3.42%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.84%

EWHYX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.18%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.80%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WHYIX
Allspring High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
2.77%2.76%5.61%5.78%-12.07%0.70%
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
3.35%3.59%5.42%7.74%-11.72%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between WHYIX and EWHYX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.90

The correlation between WHYIX and EWHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHYIX vs. EWHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHYIX
WHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EWHYX
EWHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EWHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EWHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (WHYIX) and Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHYIXEWHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.65

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.33

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

11.37

-0.77

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHYIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the EWHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHYIX and EWHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHYIXEWHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.31

+0.60

Drawdowns

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHYIX drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EWHYX drawdown of -16.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHYIX and EWHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHYIXEWHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-16.52%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-3.04%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.18%

-7.54%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-5.37%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.89%

-0.09%

Volatility

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (WHYIX) is 1.16%, while Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that WHYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHYIXEWHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.39%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

2.59%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

3.76%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

5.24%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

5.24%

-0.71%

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHYIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EWHYX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHYIX vs. EWHYX - Dividend Comparison

WHYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than EWHYX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
5.11%5.06%4.92%3.97%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WHYIX
Allspring High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.71%4.69%4.71%3.74%4.04%3.81%4.24%3.73%3.96%3.89%4.41%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHYIX and EWHYX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWHYX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to WHYIX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHYIX dropped -16.88% vs EWHYX's -16.52%.

EWHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHYIX and EWHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer