WHGMX vs. SCSAX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WHGMX (Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund) and SCSAX (Allspring Common Stock Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WHGMX returned 10.59%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for SCSAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WHGMX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for SCSAX.

Performance

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) and Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WHGMX having a 16.89% return and SCSAX slightly lower at 16.36%. Over the past 10 years, WHGMX has underperformed SCSAX with an annualized return of 10.59%, while SCSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.

WHGMX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 16.89%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

SCSAX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 16.36%
• 6M: 14.04%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 4.66%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WHGMX Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund	16.89%	8.40%	10.41%	17.78%	-10.35%	21.39%	5.41%	29.42%	-11.70%	10.39%
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund	16.36%	1.44%	6.51%	15.90%	-17.71%	21.14%	15.34%	47.23%	-10.02%	17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGMX and SCSAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005	0.93

The correlation between WHGMX and SCSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WHGMX vs. SCSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGMX

WHGMX Risk / Return Rank: 51
WHGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
WHGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WHGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
WHGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WHGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SCSAX

SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 24
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) and Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WHGMX	SCSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.06	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.64	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.19	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.57	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.88	5.48	+3.40

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the SCSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGMX and SCSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGMX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, smaller than the maximum SCSAX drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGMX and SCSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WHGMX	SCSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.99%	-53.49%	+5.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-12.68%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.78%	-26.64%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.78%	-38.46%	+14.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.26%	-45.63%	+3.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-1.12%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-10.27%	+3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.62%	-0.73%

Volatility

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) is 5.35%, while Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that WHGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WHGMX	SCSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	6.68%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.94%	14.68%	-2.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	18.71%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	23.96%	-5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.29%	24.00%	-3.71%

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGMX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than SCSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WHGMX vs. SCSAX - Dividend Comparison

WHGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than SCSAX's 3.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCSAX Allspring Common Stock Fund	3.79%	4.42%	6.38%	3.56%	17.66%	19.38%	4.87%	26.88%	18.74%	11.05%	3.82%	12.95%
WHGMX Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund	4.44%	5.19%	1.21%	2.92%	1.52%	16.39%	2.83%	11.93%	19.09%	12.12%	1.40%	7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WHGMX and SCSAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, WHGMX and SCSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WHGMX or SCSAX?

SCSAX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to WHGMX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGMX dropped -47.99% vs SCSAX's -53.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WHGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.