WHGMX vs. GQETX
WHGMX (Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund) and GQETX (GMO Quality Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. Over the past 10 years, WHGMX returned 9.74%/yr vs 15.76%/yr for GQETX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WHGMX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQETX.
Performance
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHGMX achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than GQETX's 6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGMX has underperformed GQETX with an annualized return of 9.74%, while GQETX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.76% annualized return.
WHGMX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.47%
GQETX
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GQETX GMO Quality Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGMX Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund | 14.93% | 8.40% | 10.41% | 17.78% | -10.35% | 21.39% | 5.41% | 29.42% | -11.70% | 10.39% |
GQETX GMO Quality Fund | 6.51% | 19.61% | 17.76% | 28.94% | -15.33% | 31.67% | 18.33% | 31.77% | 0.50% | 29.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHGMX and GQETX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005 | 0.77 |
The correlation between WHGMX and GQETX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHGMX vs. GQETX — Risk / Return Rank
WHGMX
GQETX
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHGMX | GQETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.50 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 5.93 | +0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHGMX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than GQETX's maximum drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGMX and GQETX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHGMX | GQETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -39.99% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -12.76% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.78% | -15.54% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.78% | -24.22% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.26% | -30.44% | -11.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -0.36% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -4.97% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.23% | -0.30% |
Volatility
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Volatility Comparison
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) at 3.13%. This indicates that WHGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHGMX | GQETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 3.13% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 10.17% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 12.81% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 15.93% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 17.06% | +3.20% |
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHGMX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GQETX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WHGMX vs. GQETX - Dividend Comparison
WHGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than GQETX's 11.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQETX GMO Quality Fund | 11.24% | 11.16% | 3.91% | 3.43% | 11.85% | 10.19% | 13.61% | 8.08% | 21.66% | 8.10% | 3.56% | 17.25% |
WHGMX Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund | 4.52% | 5.19% | 1.21% | 2.92% | 1.52% | 16.39% | 2.83% | 11.93% | 19.09% | 12.12% | 1.40% | 7.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WHGMX and GQETX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WHGMX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to GQETX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGMX dropped -47.99% vs GQETX's -39.99%.
GQETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WHGMX and GQETX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer