PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGMX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WHGMX

1D
1.53%
1M
2.93%
YTD
14.01%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
9.95%

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WHGMX and ATGAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGMX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGMX
WHGMX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WHGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGMXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGMXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

58.33

-57.88

Drawdowns

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGMX drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGMX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGMXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

0.00%

-47.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

0.00%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

0.00%

-7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

Volatility

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGMXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

9.26%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

9.26%

+9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

9.26%

+11.04%

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGMX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGMX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

WHGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WHGMX
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund
4.56%5.19%1.21%2.92%1.52%16.39%2.83%11.93%19.09%12.12%1.40%7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGMX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGMX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer