WHGLX vs. YAFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX).
WHGLX is managed by Westwood. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. YAFFX is managed by AMG. It was launched on May 1, 1997.
Performance
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | -1.62% | 5.73% | 10.52% | 8.91% | -5.64% | 23.73% | 2.71% | 27.34% | -6.18% | 20.86% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 10.26% | 3.89% | 9.30% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 2.99% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
WHGLX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
YAFFX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 12.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WHGLX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
WHGLX
YAFFX
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHGLX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 0.76 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 2.29 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHGLX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.68 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.59 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHGLX and YAFFX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.27%, while YAFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | 22.27% | 21.91% | 7.64% | 3.78% | 1.52% | 17.70% | 5.86% | 4.63% | 12.36% | 6.53% | 4.04% | 10.08% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.44% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Drawdowns
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and YAFFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHGLX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -43.80% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -17.08% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -21.31% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -30.62% | -5.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -7.31% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -6.24% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 4.85% | -2.55% |
Volatility
WHGLX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 3.49%, while AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHGLX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 8.00% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 21.56% | -14.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 22.92% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 17.86% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.40% | -0.16% |