WHGLX vs. NEIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX).
WHGLX is managed by Westwood. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. NEIMX is managed by Neiman Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2003.
Performance
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | -1.62% | 5.73% | 10.52% | 8.91% | -5.64% | 23.73% | 2.71% | 27.34% | -6.18% | 20.86% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 3.55% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 23.49% | -9.76% | 19.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 3.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WHGLX having a 8.95% annualized return and NEIMX not far ahead at 9.03%.
WHGLX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
NEIMX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WHGLX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
WHGLX
NEIMX
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WHGLX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.58 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 2.21 | -1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.11 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 10.67 | -8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WHGLX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.58 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.02 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.02 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.03 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between WHGLX and NEIMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.27%, more than NEIMX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHGLX Westwood Quality Value Fund | 22.27% | 21.91% | 7.64% | 3.78% | 1.52% | 17.70% | 5.86% | 4.63% | 12.36% | 6.53% | 4.04% | 10.08% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and NEIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHGLX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.00% | -92.94% | +41.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -10.78% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -92.94% | +76.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.32% | -92.94% | +56.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -90.28% | +83.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -9.91% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.13% | +0.17% |
Volatility
WHGLX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WHGLX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 3.41% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 8.30% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 15.57% | -2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 576.30% | -562.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 407.62% | -391.38% |