PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. LEIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Federated Hermes Equity Income Fund (LEIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than LEIFX's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has outperformed LEIFX with an annualized return of 9.57%, while LEIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.84% annualized return.


WHGLX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.06%
YTD
5.81%
6M
5.75%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
9.57%

LEIFX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
5.16%
6M
7.44%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
5.81%5.73%10.52%8.91%-5.64%23.73%2.71%27.34%-6.18%20.86%
LEIFX
Federated Hermes Equity Income Fund
5.16%15.18%-0.45%8.82%-7.96%21.12%6.43%21.27%-12.13%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and LEIFX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between WHGLX and LEIFX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. LEIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LEIFX
LEIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LEIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
LEIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Federated Hermes Equity Income Fund (LEIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGLXLEIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.18

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

10.02

-3.22

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the LEIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and LEIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGLXLEIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.04

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.29

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, roughly equal to the maximum LEIFX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and LEIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXLEIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-49.19%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-6.01%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-25.60%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-25.60%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-36.86%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-3.65%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-10.04%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.90%

-0.08%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 2.47%, while Federated Hermes Equity Income Fund (LEIFX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXLEIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.82%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

7.07%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.76%

9.38%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

15.13%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.39%

-1.15%

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LEIFX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. LEIFX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.71%, less than LEIFX's 24.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEIFX
Federated Hermes Equity Income Fund
24.27%24.92%0.82%1.08%7.54%16.37%1.17%2.01%19.47%5.34%3.98%3.15%
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
20.71%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGLX and LEIFX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEIFX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to WHGLX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs LEIFX's -49.19%.

LEIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGLX and LEIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer