PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. GQETX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than GQETX's 6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has underperformed GQETX with an annualized return of 9.58%, while GQETX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.76% annualized return.


WHGLX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.79%
6M
6.07%
YTD
8.97%
1Y
12.38%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.58%
ALL TIME*
8.19%

GQETX

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.11%
6M
4.98%
YTD
6.51%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
15.76%
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
8.97%5.73%10.52%8.91%-5.64%23.73%2.71%27.34%-6.18%20.86%
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
6.51%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%29.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and GQETX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2006

0.86

The correlation between WHGLX and GQETX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. GQETX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and GMO Quality Fund (GQETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHGLXGQETXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.50

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.70

5.93

-0.22

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the GQETX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and GQETX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, which is greater than GQETX's maximum drawdown of -39.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and GQETX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXGQETXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-39.99%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-12.76%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.54%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-24.22%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-30.44%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.36%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-4.97%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

3.23%

-1.41%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) is 2.67%, while GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that WHGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXGQETXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.13%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

10.17%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

12.81%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

15.93%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

17.06%

-0.86%

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GQETX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. GQETX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, more than GQETX's 11.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
11.24%11.16%3.91%3.43%11.85%10.19%13.61%8.08%21.66%8.10%3.56%17.25%
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
20.11%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHGLX and GQETX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQETX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to WHGLX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WHGLX dropped -51.00% vs GQETX's -39.99%.

GQETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHGLX and GQETX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer