PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHGLX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
-1.62%5.73%10.52%8.91%-5.64%23.73%2.71%27.34%-6.18%20.86%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
2.54%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHGLX achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, WHGLX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.95% annualized return.


WHGLX

1D
0.17%
1M
-6.72%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
8.95%

FGINX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
2.54%
6M
11.55%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WHGLX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHGLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WHGLX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHGLX
WHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHGLXFGINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.77

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

2.38

-1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.37

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.28

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.09

9.83

-7.75

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHGLX and FGINX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHGLXFGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.77

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.99

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.70

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between WHGLX and FGINX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

WHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.27%, more than FGINX's 11.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WHGLX
Westwood Quality Value Fund
22.27%21.91%7.64%3.78%1.52%17.70%5.86%4.63%12.36%6.53%4.04%10.08%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
11.08%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%

Drawdowns

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHGLX drawdown since its inception was -51.00%, smaller than the maximum FGINX drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHGLX and FGINX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WHGLXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.00%

-54.80%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-11.56%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.62%

-16.21%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.32%

-37.37%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-7.34%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-9.74%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.68%

-0.38%

Volatility

WHGLX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

Westwood Quality Value Fund (WHGLX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WHGLXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.56%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

8.83%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

16.14%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

14.86%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.03%

-0.79%