WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L
WHEA.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HLTW.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - WHEA.L tracks the MSCI World Health Care 35/20 Capped Index while HLTW.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WHEA.L returned 8.36%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for HLTW.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WHEA.L achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than HLTW.L's 2.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WHEA.L having a 8.36% annualized return and HLTW.L not far behind at 8.21%.
WHEA.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
HLTW.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WHEA.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.00% | 15.24% | 1.05% | 3.54% | -5.55% | 20.41% | 12.93% | 23.18% | 1.48% | 20.27% |
HLTW.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD | 2.77% | 15.73% | 0.39% | 3.08% | -5.66% | 20.58% | 12.94% | 22.85% | 2.03% | 19.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between WHEA.L and HLTW.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between WHEA.L and HLTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
WHEA.L
HLTW.L
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WHEA.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WHEA.L | HLTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.57 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.35 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 3.49 | +1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WHEA.L drawdown since its inception was -26.20%, smaller than the maximum HLTW.L drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.L and HLTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WHEA.L | HLTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.20% | -54.56% | +28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.35% | -54.56% | +44.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -54.56% | +35.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -54.56% | +35.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.20% | -54.56% | +28.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.78% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -4.84% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 5.51% | -1.24% |
Volatility
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WHEA.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L) have volatilities of 5.38% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WHEA.L | HLTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 5.38% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 11.66% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 131.78% | -116.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 60.42% | -46.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 44.06% | -29.32% |
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WHEA.L and HLTW.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
WHEA.L vs. HLTW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WHEA.L nor HLTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, WHEA.L and HLTW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WHEA.L and HLTW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
WHEA.L tracks MSCI World Health Care 35/20 Capped Index, while HLTW.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for WHEA.L and HLTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer