PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and SPDR MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF (WTEL.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHEA.AS achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than WTEL.AS's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, WHEA.AS has underperformed WTEL.AS with an annualized return of 7.60%, while WTEL.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.


WHEA.AS

1D
2.78%
1M
3.81%
YTD
-1.97%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.60%

WTEL.AS

1D
0.98%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
4.80%
6M
3.56%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHEA.AS
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
-1.97%2.03%7.60%0.67%-0.70%30.65%3.27%25.71%6.68%5.47%
WTEL.AS
SPDR MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF
4.80%14.25%44.37%41.40%-34.31%25.76%11.99%28.45%-5.05%-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2009

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHEA.AS
WHEA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WTEL.AS
WTEL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WTEL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTEL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTEL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WTEL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTEL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and SPDR MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF (WTEL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHEA.ASWTEL.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.35

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

8.89

-6.65

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the WTEL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHEA.ASWTEL.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.64

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.64

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.56

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.52

+0.16

Drawdowns

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHEA.AS drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum WTEL.AS drawdown of -36.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHEA.ASWTEL.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-36.50%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-9.71%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.20%

-24.16%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-36.50%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-36.50%

+10.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

-2.92%

-5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-7.90%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

2.58%

+1.66%

Volatility

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to SPDR MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF (WTEL.AS) at 3.63%. This indicates that WHEA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTEL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHEA.ASWTEL.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

3.63%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

9.56%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

13.88%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

18.24%

-4.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

18.37%

-3.84%

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

WHEA.AS vs. WTEL.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WHEA.AS nor WTEL.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

WHEA.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while WTEL.AS is Communications Equities. WHEA.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while WTEL.AS tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHEA.AS and WTEL.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer