PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHEA.AS vs. PSCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WHEA.AS is traded in EUR, while PSCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSCH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHEA.AS achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 25.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WHEA.AS having a 7.70% annualized return and PSCH not far ahead at 7.92%.


WHEA.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
6.58%
6M
4.29%
YTD
4.74%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
7.70%
ALL TIME*
10.34%

PSCH

1D
1.10%
1M
10.93%
6M
23.04%
YTD
25.26%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
-1.99%
10Y*
7.92%
ALL TIME*
13.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHEA.AS
State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
4.74%2.03%7.60%0.67%-0.70%30.65%3.27%25.71%6.68%5.47%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
25.26%-12.30%10.62%-5.63%-20.51%13.66%20.64%22.89%14.27%18.29%

Correlation

The correlation between WHEA.AS and PSCH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.47

The correlation between WHEA.AS and PSCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (5 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHEA.AS
WHEA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHEA.ASPSCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.06

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

8.88

-3.61

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the PSCH Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHEA.AS and PSCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHEA.AS drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum PSCH drawdown of -40.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.AS and PSCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHEA.ASPSCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-40.75%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-14.27%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.20%

-31.14%

+9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-40.75%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-40.75%

+14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-13.87%

+11.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-11.84%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

4.91%

-0.75%

Volatility

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) at 5.17%. This indicates that WHEA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHEA.ASPSCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

5.17%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

14.17%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

19.51%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

22.47%

-8.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

23.94%

-9.33%

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHEA.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHEA.AS vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison

WHEA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%
WHEA.AS
State Street SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHEA.AS and PSCH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WHEA.AS.

WHEA.AS tracks MSCI World Health Care 35/20 Capped Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WHEA.AS and 0.29% for PSCH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHEA.AS and PSCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer