PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WHEA.AS achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than DIA.AS's 8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, WHEA.AS has underperformed DIA.AS with an annualized return of 7.60%, while DIA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.


WHEA.AS

1D
2.78%
1M
3.81%
YTD
-1.97%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
2.59%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
7.60%

DIA.AS

1D
1.10%
1M
5.49%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.86%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WHEA.AS
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
-1.97%2.03%7.60%0.67%-0.70%30.65%3.27%25.71%6.68%5.47%
DIA.AS
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
8.38%2.13%22.48%11.53%-1.09%31.76%-0.04%26.82%0.96%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between WHEA.AS and DIA.AS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2009

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between WHEA.AS and DIA.AS has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WHEA.AS
WHEA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHEA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA.AS
DIA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DIA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHEA.ASDIA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

2.19

-1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

3.72

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

13.16

-10.91

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WHEA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the DIA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WHEA.AS and DIA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHEA.ASDIA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

2.33

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.82

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.76

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.10

+0.58

Drawdowns

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WHEA.AS drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum DIA.AS drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WHEA.AS and DIA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHEA.ASDIA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-59.02%

+33.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-5.71%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.20%

-21.07%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.20%

-21.07%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.77%

-36.08%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

0.00%

-8.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-11.92%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

1.62%

+2.62%

Volatility

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF (WHEA.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) at 2.50%. This indicates that WHEA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHEA.ASDIA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

2.50%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

7.95%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

9.11%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.39%

13.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

17.04%

-2.51%

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WHEA.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA.AS's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

WHEA.AS vs. DIA.AS - Dividend Comparison

WHEA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA.AS
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.35%1.47%1.55%1.85%1.93%1.52%2.03%2.10%2.18%2.08%2.16%2.51%
WHEA.AS
SPDR MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WHEA.AS and DIA.AS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DIA.AS is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DIA.AS is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WHEA.AS.

WHEA.AS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DIA.AS is Large Cap Value Equities. WHEA.AS tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while DIA.AS tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WHEA.AS and 0.16% for DIA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WHEA.AS and DIA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer