PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGRX vs. NEUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WGRX vs. NEUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wellgistics Health, Inc (WGRX) and Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc (NEUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGRX achieves a -84.38% return, which is significantly lower than NEUP's 12.37% return.


WGRX

1D
0.65%
1M
-24.55%
YTD
-84.38%
6M
-85.42%
1Y
-94.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEUP

1D
-1.80%
1M
-20.44%
YTD
12.37%
6M
15.65%
1Y
-27.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGRX vs. NEUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WGRX
Wellgistics Health, Inc
-84.38%-90.82%
NEUP
Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc
12.37%-23.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WGRX and NEUP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WGRX:

$326.42M

NEUP:

$23.59M

EPS

WGRX:

-$0.98

NEUP:

-$113.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

WGRX:

$14.03M

NEUP:

-$15.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WGRX:

-$10.16M

NEUP:

-$15.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

WGRX:

-$53.11M

NEUP:

-$865.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Wellgistics Health, Inc

Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc

Return for Risk

WGRX vs. NEUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGRX
WGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NEUP
NEUP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NEUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEUP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NEUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEUP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGRX vs. NEUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wellgistics Health, Inc (WGRX) and Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc (NEUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WGRXNEUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.13

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.34

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-0.44

-0.89

WGRX vs. NEUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the NEUP Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGRX and NEUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WGRX vs. NEUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGRX drawdown since its inception was -98.75%, which is greater than NEUP's maximum drawdown of -81.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGRX and NEUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGRXNEUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.75%

-81.40%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.42%

-81.40%

-15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.74%

-78.20%

-20.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.05%

-44.60%

-31.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.97%

63.87%

+7.10%

Volatility

WGRX vs. NEUP - Volatility Comparison

Wellgistics Health, Inc (WGRX) has a higher volatility of 45.49% compared to Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc (NEUP) at 16.25%. This indicates that WGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGRXNEUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.49%

16.25%

+29.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

118.84%

32.32%

+86.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

266.56%

124.50%

+142.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

246.74%

2,072.05%

-1,825.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

246.74%

2,072.05%

-1,825.31%

Dividends

WGRX vs. NEUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither WGRX nor NEUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WGRX vs. NEUP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wellgistics Health, Inc and Neuphoria Therapeutics Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-20.00M-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00MJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.56M
0
(WGRX) Total Revenue
(NEUP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WGRX and NEUP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGRX has higher volatility (45.49%) compared to NEUP (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGRX dropped -98.75% vs NEUP's -81.40%.

NEUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGRX and NEUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer