WGMI vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. WGMI is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, WGMI returned 292.37% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

WGMI vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 85.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

WGMI

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 14.61%
• YTD: 85.47%
• 6M: 70.99%
• 1Y: 292.37%
• 3Y*: 76.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	85.47%	72.47%	23.54%	68.49%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and IBID is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	-0.00

The correlation between WGMI and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 82
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WGMI	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.84	3.19	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	5.38	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.72	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	7.20	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.70	29.14	-17.44

WGMI vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is comparable to the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-1.28%	-84.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-0.55%	-50.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-0.55%	-1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.43%	-0.22%	-42.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.12%	0.13%	+24.99%

Volatility

WGMI vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 20.98% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.98%	0.35%	+20.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.32%	0.86%	+54.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.84%	1.23%	+75.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.51%	2.24%	+79.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.51%	2.24%	+79.27%

WGMI vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGMI vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and IBID in my portfolio?

WGMI and IBID have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WGMI or IBID?

WGMI has higher volatility (20.98%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or IBID?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 292.37% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 292.37% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and IBID?

WGMI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.