WGMI vs. ETH
WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and ETH (Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WGMI returned 294.61% vs -30.84% for ETH. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETH.
Performance
WGMI vs. ETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 84.78% return, which is significantly higher than ETH's -38.95% return.
WGMI
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 40.03%
- YTD
- 84.78%
- 6M
- 55.52%
- 1Y
- 294.61%
- 3Y*
- 86.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETH
- 1D
- -5.52%
- 1M
- -23.42%
- YTD
- -38.95%
- 6M
- -42.17%
- 1Y
- -30.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGMI vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 84.78% | 72.47% | -8.38% |
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | -38.95% | -10.89% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGMI and ETH is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between WGMI and ETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGMI vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank
WGMI
ETH
WGMI vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGMI | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.97 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | -0.50 | +6.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | -0.82 | +12.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGMI | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91 | -0.45 | +4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.41 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
WGMI vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than ETH's maximum drawdown of -64.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and ETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGMI | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.76% | -64.01% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.94% | -62.40% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -62.40% | +61.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -32.58% | -10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.08% | 37.50% | -12.42% |
Volatility
WGMI vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison
Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 20.10% compared to Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) at 9.90%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGMI | ETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.10% | 9.90% | +10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.64% | 46.02% | +9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.03% | 68.34% | +7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.53% | 72.26% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.53% | 72.26% | +9.27% |
WGMI vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
WGMI vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison
Neither WGMI nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETH Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGMI and ETH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGMI has higher volatility (20.10%) compared to ETH (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs ETH's -64.01%.
On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 294.61% vs -30.84% for ETH. On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 294.61% return vs -30.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
WGMI and ETH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.15% for ETH.
WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGMI and ETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer