WGMI vs. DIME
WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) and DIME (CoinShares Altcoins ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from CoinShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for DIME.
Performance
WGMI vs. DIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 37.84% return, which is significantly higher than DIME's -35.18% return.
WGMI
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 37.84%
- 1Y
- 112.44%
- 3Y*
- 55.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.03%
DIME
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -23.05%
- YTD
- -35.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.08K | $9.43K | $24.24K | |
| $36.71M | $32.23M | $41.00M |
WGMI vs. DIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 37.84% | -26.81% |
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF | -35.18% | -58.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGMI and DIME is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGMI vs. DIME — Risk / Return Rank
WGMI
DIME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WGMI vs. DIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WGMI | DIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WGMI vs. DIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, which is greater than DIME's maximum drawdown of -74.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and DIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGMI | DIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.76% | -74.46% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.84% | -72.96% | +46.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.94% | -60.37% | +18.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.39% | — | — |
Volatility
WGMI vs. DIME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGMI | DIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.08% | 74.49% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.40% | 74.49% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.40% | 74.49% | +7.91% |
WGMI vs. DIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DIME's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
WGMI vs. DIME - Dividend Comparison
Neither WGMI nor DIME has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGMI and DIME have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIME is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIME is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.
WGMI and DIME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.00% for DIME.
Find the right allocation for WGMI and DIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer