WGMI vs. BKCH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WGMI (Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF) and BKCH (Global X Blockchain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while BKCH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WGMI returned 88.52%/yr vs 58.43%/yr for BKCH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WGMI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BKCH.

Performance

WGMI vs. BKCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGMI achieves a 81.24% return, which is significantly higher than BKCH's 36.44% return.

WGMI

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: 25.79%
• YTD: 81.24%
• 6M: 46.67%
• 1Y: 261.44%
• 3Y*: 88.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKCH

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 5.62%
• YTD: 36.44%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: 86.50%
• 3Y*: 58.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGMI vs. BKCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	81.24%	72.47%	23.54%	304.08%	-83.48%
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	36.44%	27.14%	18.81%	267.06%	-82.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WGMI and BKCH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.96

The correlation between WGMI and BKCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WGMI vs. BKCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

BKCH

BKCH Risk / Return Rank: 32
BKCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BKCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BKCH Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BKCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BKCH Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGMI vs. BKCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) and Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WGMI	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	1.25	+2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.88	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.22	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	1.55	+3.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	2.86	+7.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WGMI vs. BKCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGMI Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is higher than the BKCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGMI and BKCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WGMI	BKCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48	1.25	+2.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.03	+0.27

Drawdowns

WGMI vs. BKCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGMI drawdown since its inception was -85.76%, smaller than the maximum BKCH drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGMI and BKCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WGMI	BKCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.76%	-91.80%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.94%	-56.28%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.79%	-57.99%	-4.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-34.59%	+31.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.86%	-62.10%	+19.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.08%	30.30%	-5.22%

Volatility

WGMI vs. BKCH - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) at 17.28%. This indicates that WGMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WGMI	BKCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.90%	17.28%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.08%	51.28%	+3.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.99%	69.80%	+6.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.50%	75.40%	+6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.50%	75.40%	+6.10%

WGMI vs. BKCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WGMI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BKCH's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WGMI vs. BKCH - Dividend Comparison

WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCH Global X Blockchain ETF	1.47%	2.00%	7.61%	2.33%	1.29%	4.28%
WGMI Valkyrie Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WGMI and BKCH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, WGMI and BKCH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WGMI or BKCH?

WGMI has higher volatility (18.90%) compared to BKCH (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGMI dropped -85.76% vs BKCH's -91.80%.

Which ETF is better, WGMI or BKCH?

On 3-year performance, WGMI leads with 88.52% vs 58.43% for BKCH. On fees, BKCH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BKCH has been the lower-risk option at 17.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WGMI or BKCH?

Over the 3-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 88.52% return vs 58.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WGMI or BKCH?

BKCH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WGMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WGMI or BKCH?

BKCH has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between WGMI and BKCH?

WGMI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BKCH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WGMI and 0.50% for BKCH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.